Featured

On ‘Jeopardy!’ women take fewer risks vs. men

June 27, 2011 1663

Tom Jacobs writes in Miller-McCune Magazine about a study of contestant behavior on a game show that suggests women tend to hedge their bets when facing male opponents.

The answer is: It’s a game show that provides surprising clues about sex, social rules and risk-taking.

And the question is: What is Jeopardy!?

Two Swedish researchers, writing in the journal Economics Letters, report an intriguing pattern of behavior by contestants on the popular quiz program. Women, it seems, take fewer risks when their Jeopardy! opponents are men.

Gabriella Sjogren Lindquist and Jenny Save-Soderbergh of the Swedish Institute for Social Research looked at 206 episodes of Jeopardy!, focusing on those moments when one of the three contestants must decide how much to wage on a Daily Double.

For those unfamiliar with the Jeopardy!, Daily Doubles pop up at random during the course of play. Rather than wagering a set amount on whether they will know the answer to a question (the show’s usual format), contestants are given the opportunity to bet as much or as little as they like, up to the amount of money they have accumulated to that point.

The researchers tallied the results of 615 Daily Doubles, featuring 251 male and 65 female contestants. (The same contestant can play several Daily Doubles during the course of the show, and still more if he or she wins and returns the next day.)

The researchers found “no systemic gender differences in performance,” either on the Daily Double questions or the final scores. But they also determined that “male players are more likely to give the correct answer when competing against males only.” Perhaps man-to-man competition, which played a vital role in our evolutionary past, sharpens the male mind…

Click here to read the article in its entirety.

One of Library Journal’s Best Magazines of 2008, Miller-McCune not only identifies policy issues of global important but provides evidence-based solutions offered by academic research and real-world models. Through excellent but understandable writing and proven judgment in what to cover, the nonprofit Miller-McCune has received a surprising amount of acclaim and, more importantly, a large and growing audience interested in the social and natural sciences.

View all posts by Pacific-Standard Magazine

Related Articles

New Guide Recognizes the Value of Good Curation
Bookshelf
October 29, 2025

New Guide Recognizes the Value of Good Curation

Read Now
The Musée des Confluences: Celebrating Secularism and the Sciences
Public Engagement
October 13, 2025

The Musée des Confluences: Celebrating Secularism and the Sciences

Read Now
Public Health and American Exceptionalism: Part II Raw Milk
Public Policy
September 27, 2025

Public Health and American Exceptionalism: Part II Raw Milk

Read Now
Public Health and American Exceptionalism: Part I – Vaccine Mandates
Public Policy
September 15, 2025

Public Health and American Exceptionalism: Part I – Vaccine Mandates

Read Now
CDC – Meltdown or Hissy Fit?

CDC – Meltdown or Hissy Fit?

At the time of writing, there is a new stand-off between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Trump administration […]

Read Now
Ramanan Laxminarayan on Antibiotic Use

Ramanan Laxminarayan on Antibiotic Use

Let’s say you were asked to name the greatest health risks facing the planet. Priceton University economist Ramanan Laxminarayan, founder and director […]

Read Now
Isaac Asimov’s Critique of Algorithmic Thinking

Isaac Asimov’s Critique of Algorithmic Thinking

Isaac Asimov (1920-1992) left a legacy of influence that many more literary writers might envy. In his own lifetime, he was one […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments