Impact

National Science Foundation responds to Senate staff report

July 29, 2011 1571

Eddie Bernice Johnson, Ranking Minority Member of the National Science Foundation Committee, has released a  staff report refuting a recent Senate report on the NSF which claims that the agency had wasted  three billion dollars of federal funding.

The Congresswoman stated, “I am sure that the Senate staff report was intended to be an important, detailed review of NSF, but in the end, our Committee staff could find almost no actual savings in the report.  NSF does not have $1.7 billion that they can return to the Treasury.  The report offers no proof that NSF has $1.2 billion in programs that are duplicative with those of other agencies.  Finally the claim by the report’s authors that they could find $65 million in questionable research projects appears to be built on a very superficial examination of the awards—in fact, it appears that at least four of the cited studies were not even funded by NSF.”

“It is important to engage in a serious discussion of those areas of federal spending where we can save money.  However, that dialogue—and our subsequent decisions—should be rooted in the facts.  The allegations in the Senate staff report were very, very serious, but they turn out to be mistaken.  As a result, there is no information in the report that can help inform Congress’s decisions about NSF funding and priorities.”

Committee polls found that few researchers cited in the Senate report felt that it accurately described their work; furthermore, none of the researchers who responded to Committee staff questions had ever been contacted by Senate staff about the work cited in the Senate staff report.

Click here to read more about the Senate report, and Congresswoman Johnson’s response.

Editorial Assistant - Social Science Journals at SAGE in Los Angeles

View all posts by Lisa Hanson

Related Articles

Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award
Interdisciplinarity
August 18, 2026

Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award

Read Now
NSF’s Embattled SBE Directorate Shown as Agency’s Policy Heavyweight
Impact
August 10, 2026

NSF’s Embattled SBE Directorate Shown as Agency’s Policy Heavyweight

Read Now
Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated
Insights
August 9, 2026

Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated

Read Now
Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic
Artificial Intelligence
August 4, 2026

Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic

Read Now
Sage’s 10-Year Impact Awards Capture Longer-Term Significance

Sage’s 10-Year Impact Awards Capture Longer-Term Significance

Sage’s 10-Year Impact Awards recognize academic papers appearing in Sage-published journals that have achieved lasting impact. The winning papers are the most […]

Read Now
Quick Insight: David Edmonds on Podcasting for Academe

Quick Insight: David Edmonds on Podcasting for Academe

A little over 20 years ago, some 8,000 podcasts joined the iTunes platform, according to Beamly. While not all podcasts, that figure […]

Read Now
The Odyssey and the Social Order

The Odyssey and the Social Order

A clunky booking website and my failure to check dates before pressing ‘buy’ meant that I saw Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey on […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted