Impact

National Science Foundation responds to Senate staff report

July 29, 2011 1429

Eddie Bernice Johnson, Ranking Minority Member of the National Science Foundation Committee, has released a  staff report refuting a recent Senate report on the NSF which claims that the agency had wasted  three billion dollars of federal funding.

The Congresswoman stated, “I am sure that the Senate staff report was intended to be an important, detailed review of NSF, but in the end, our Committee staff could find almost no actual savings in the report.  NSF does not have $1.7 billion that they can return to the Treasury.  The report offers no proof that NSF has $1.2 billion in programs that are duplicative with those of other agencies.  Finally the claim by the report’s authors that they could find $65 million in questionable research projects appears to be built on a very superficial examination of the awards—in fact, it appears that at least four of the cited studies were not even funded by NSF.”

“It is important to engage in a serious discussion of those areas of federal spending where we can save money.  However, that dialogue—and our subsequent decisions—should be rooted in the facts.  The allegations in the Senate staff report were very, very serious, but they turn out to be mistaken.  As a result, there is no information in the report that can help inform Congress’s decisions about NSF funding and priorities.”

Committee polls found that few researchers cited in the Senate report felt that it accurately described their work; furthermore, none of the researchers who responded to Committee staff questions had ever been contacted by Senate staff about the work cited in the Senate staff report.

Click here to read more about the Senate report, and Congresswoman Johnson’s response.

Editorial Assistant - Social Science Journals at SAGE in Los Angeles

View all posts by Lisa Hanson

Related Articles

JG Ballard and the Epstein Files
News
April 15, 2026

JG Ballard and the Epstein Files

Read Now
Challenges to Democracy
Opinion
April 3, 2026

Challenges to Democracy

Read Now
Closing the Gap: Research, Representation and Women’s History at Sage
International Debate
March 30, 2026

Closing the Gap: Research, Representation and Women’s History at Sage

Read Now
Jürgen Habermas, 1929-2026: Exponent of the Public Sphere
Impact
March 16, 2026

Jürgen Habermas, 1929-2026: Exponent of the Public Sphere

Read Now
Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

What happens to a college education when a chatbot can draft an essay, summarize a reading and generate computer code in seconds? […]

Read Now
Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Eighty years ago this month, the United Kingdom pioneered a novel form of social science research, the life-long cohort study. The tool […]

Read Now
Why trading volume in prediction markets matters more than you think — and how event-outcome mechanics drive it

Why trading volume in prediction markets matters more than you think — and how event-outcome mechanics drive it

What does high trading volume in a prediction market actually signal: superior information, a liquidity mirage, or simply good marketing? Traders often […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments