Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?
The landscape of academic grant funding is notoriously competitive and plagued by lengthy, bureaucratic processes, exacerbated by difficulties in finding willing reviewers. Distributed […]
Andy Tattersall looks at the shortcomings and opportunities of post-publication review online and picks apart the differences between reviewing, discussing and commenting in a scholarly context.
The December issue of Administrative Science Quarterly is now available and can be read online for free for the next 30 days. […]
We are delighted to congratulate Seigyoung Auh, winner of Journal of Service Research‘s Best Reviewer Award! Dr. Auh, kindly provided us with […]
We’re pleased to congratulate Achilles Armenakis, winner of the Journal of Applied Behavioral Science‘s Best Reviewer Award for 2013! Dr. Armenakis graciously […]
We’re pleased to announce that William L. Gardner of Texas Tech University has been appointed as the new Editor of Group and […]
World Future Review is a refereed journal that seeks to expand communication among the researchers and practitioners now exploring trends and alternatives […]
An experiment on economists looked at offering small stipends for reviewers, as well as tighter deadlines and dollop of public shaming. Which worked, and could this have implications beyond this field and this journal? Max Nathan discusses.
Could the increasing number of retractions in quality journals be a sign that its time to embrace post-publication open evaluation as a corrective to pre-publication peer review?