International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 1852

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated
Insights
August 9, 2026

Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated

Read Now
Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic
Artificial Intelligence
August 4, 2026

Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic

Read Now
Quick Insight: David Edmonds on Podcasting for Academe
Communication
July 28, 2026

Quick Insight: David Edmonds on Podcasting for Academe

Read Now
The Odyssey and the Social Order
Insights
July 22, 2026

The Odyssey and the Social Order

Read Now
Watch the Panel: Academic Freedom and the Role of the Academic Librarian

Watch the Panel: Academic Freedom and the Role of the Academic Librarian

As part of its ongoing commitment to academic freedom, Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, hosted a panel discussion at the 2026 […]

Read Now
Recalling the Roots of Jewish American Heritage Month

Recalling the Roots of Jewish American Heritage Month

The United States has a long tradition of celebrating its diverse communities with heritage observances throughout the calendar year. And yet not […]

Read Now
JG Ballard and the Epstein Files

JG Ballard and the Epstein Files

The grudging disclosure of the Jeffrey Epstein files by the US government has rightly attracted a great deal of commentary. The responses […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted