International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 1819

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

The Odyssey and the Social Order
Insights
July 22, 2026

The Odyssey and the Social Order

Read Now
Watch the Panel: Academic Freedom and the Role of the Academic Librarian
Industry
July 15, 2026

Watch the Panel: Academic Freedom and the Role of the Academic Librarian

Read Now
Recalling the Roots of Jewish American Heritage Month
News
May 11, 2026

Recalling the Roots of Jewish American Heritage Month

Read Now
JG Ballard and the Epstein Files
News
April 15, 2026

JG Ballard and the Epstein Files

Read Now
Challenges to Democracy

Challenges to Democracy

David Canter explores the three interacting corrosive cycles that destroys democracies – limiting effective education, destroying a free press and limiting the […]

Read Now
Closing the Gap: Research, Representation and Women’s History at Sage

Closing the Gap: Research, Representation and Women’s History at Sage

A March 2026 report from UN Women offers a sobering reality check on women’s progress: across professional, legal and academic fields, the fight for […]

Read Now
Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

What happens to a college education when a chatbot can draft an essay, summarize a reading and generate computer code in seconds? […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted