News

Children’s Perceptions: Teachers are Girls, Scientists are Boys

August 18, 2014 1095

Five depictions of academics in kids booksWe much enjoyed Melissa Terras’ blog describing the stereotypical portrayal of academics in children’s books and comics. Melissa suggested that presenting scientists as white, male, crackpots could lead children to believe that such stereotypes were real. One way of testing this would be to examine children’s perceptions of academics, teachers and the world of science. And one way of doing this would be to examine children’s drawings.

LSE Impact logo

This article by Martin Rowley and James Hartley originally appeared on the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog as “Mad professors revisited: Evaluating children’s perceptions of academics, teachers and the world of science” and is reposted under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 3.0).

There have been several studies that have required children to draw scientists and teachers (e.g., see Chambers, 1983; Barman, 1999; Finson, 2002; Losh, Wilke and Pop, 2008 for references. In Chambers’ large 1983 study [pdf], 4,807 children in Canada and the USA (aged 3 – 11) were asked to close their eyes and imagine a scientist at work, and then to draw what they had imagined. The drawings were then scored from 1 to 7 for the presence of each of the following features:

  1. Lab coat
  2. Eyeglasses
  3. Facial growth of hair (including beards, moustaches, etc.)
  4. Symbols of research: scientific instruments and laboratory equipment
  5. Symbols of knowledge: principally books and filing cabinets
  6. Technology: the process of science
  7. Relevant captions: formulae, taxonomic classification, the ‘Eureka’ syndrome

The results showed that the mean scores increased from 0.3 for kindergarten children to 3.3 for the 11-year-olds, suggesting that these stereotypical features increased as the children got older. Perhaps more interesting was the fact that more stereotypical images were found in higher-income families.

Barman (1999) replicated this study using teachers to collect data from 1,504 American pupils aged 7-8, 8-11, and 11-14, with 50 percent boys in each group. In this study the percentage of children in each age group including the features listed above were recorded. There was a marked increase in most features from children aged 7-11, and a smaller increase from children aged 11-14. Again, in this study, most of the scientists were perceived as white males.

Losh, Wilke and Pop (2008) wanted to see if this stereotypical image applied to other professions, particularly teachers. They asked 206 American 6 to 11-year-olds (50 percent males) to draw a teacher, a veterinarian, and a scientist.  The results were scored for the percentage of drawings showing various features, with the following results:

“Draw a Scientist Test” compared to other professions

Smiling Female Attractive
Teacher 83% 70% 42%
Vet 78% 53% 32%
Scientist 69% 31% 23%

These studies do indeed suggest that children have learned to share the same views as the textbook writers referred to in Melissa’s blog.  Again scientists are seen as mainly male and unattractive whereas teachers are seen as mainly female and more attractive.

Findings such as these are important with respect to the public’s understanding of both the sciences and the social sciences. They raise issues such as: (i) what values and assumptions about science and scientists should be taught in school?  (ii) how teaching social science and science should be taught in ways that require students to engage in dialogue, discussion and debate, and (iii) the need for including contemporary issues and realistic concerns that students can relate to (such as climate change).

And, what fun it would be to assess the effects of such strategies by asking pupils to draw a sociologist, or even a social psychologist.


Martin Rowley is senior lecturer in psychology and the School of Psychology, Keele University. James Hartley is emeritus professor of psychology at Keele University

View all posts by Martin Rowley and James Hartley

Related Articles

Pandemic Nemesis: Illich reconsidered
News
June 14, 2024

Pandemic Nemesis: Illich reconsidered

Read Now
How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment
Insights
June 14, 2024

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Read Now
Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy
News
May 17, 2024

Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Read Now
Survey Suggests University Researchers Feel Powerless to Take Climate Change Action
Impact
April 18, 2024

Survey Suggests University Researchers Feel Powerless to Take Climate Change Action

Read Now
Daniel Kahneman, 1934-2024: The Grandfather of Behavioral Economics

Daniel Kahneman, 1934-2024: The Grandfather of Behavioral Economics

Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman, whose psychological insights in both the academic and the public spheres revolutionized how we approach economics, has died […]

Read Now
2024 Holberg Prize Goes to Political Theorist Achille Mbembe

2024 Holberg Prize Goes to Political Theorist Achille Mbembe

Political theorist and public intellectual Achille Mbembe, among the most read and cited scholars from the African continent, has been awarded the 2024 Holberg Prize.

Read Now
New Feminist Newsletter The Evidence Makes Research on Gender Inequality Widely Accessible

New Feminist Newsletter The Evidence Makes Research on Gender Inequality Widely Accessible

Gloria Media, with support from Sage, has launched The Evidence, a feminist newsletter that covers what you need to know about gender […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments