Impact

Campaign Releases Toolkit for Demonstrating Impact Impact
The Wales Assembly: what are the best strategies for showing your research's impact to these women and men?

Campaign Releases Toolkit for Demonstrating Impact

October 20, 2017 1906

Wales assembly

The Wales Assembly: what are the best strategies for showing your research’s impact to these women and men?

An online tool aimed at helping researchers demonstrate their work’s impact to policymakers has been launched by the Campaign for Social Science in collaboration with Cardiff University. While the new toolkit’s initial focus is on the Welsh government and National Assembly for Wales – for example, use of the Welsh language and differing policy definitions are addressed — Pathways to impact: a practical guide for researchers is seen as a possible template for increasing political clout in any devolved government.

Pathways provides guidance to link social science evidence more closely to the policy making process. It is the culmination of nearly a year of research, including practical advice from interviews with both Welsh policymakers and experienced researchers.

Knowing the terrain is everything, as the toolkit repeatedly makes clear. For example, in the section on knowing the obstacles, the toolkit notes, “Paul Cairney points out that ‘even if the “evidence” exists, it doesn’t tell you what to do’ – a simple fact that can frustrate policymakers and researchers alike.”

A series of straightforward recommendations outlines how to make sure research stands out and is most effectively put into action by civil servants, parliamentarians, and Ministers. There are four broad themes: understanding the political context and landscape; engagement and maximizing impact; credibility and independence/overcoming obstacles.

“If we are to take on any of the challenges we’re facing in Wales and across the UK, from productivity and an ageing population, to pressures on the NHS and climate change, we need a rigorous evidence-base at the heart of policymaking,” said Ashley Thomas Lenihan, a senior policy adviser at the campaign and author of the toolkit. “Social science insight and expertise plays a central role in facilitating that and addressing many of these issues.

“There is often a mismatch between the supply of research and its demand among policymakers. This means there’s a risk we’re answering complicated questions without the best evidence available, with potentially wide-ranging consequences”.

The project is the latest in the Campaign’s work to promote the role of social science expertise in policymaking, including its most recent report The Health of People, looking at how social science can improve public health.

The tool-kit launched on October 19 in Cardiff before an audience of Welsh government and Assembly members, civil servants, researchers and academics.


Related Articles

Michael Burawoy, 1947-2025: Patron Saint of Public Sociology
Career
February 6, 2025

Michael Burawoy, 1947-2025: Patron Saint of Public Sociology

Read Now
How Research Credibility Suffers in a Quantified Society
Higher Education Reform
January 8, 2025

How Research Credibility Suffers in a Quantified Society

Read Now
Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of  Academic Metrics
Infrastructure
December 18, 2024

Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of Academic Metrics

Read Now
Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Tom Burns, whose combination of play — and plays – with teaching in higher education added a light, collaborative and engaging model […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Sage 1619 Impact

Psychologists Jonathan St. B. T. Evans and Keith E. Stanovich have a history of publishing important research papers that resonate for years.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments