Public Policy

Outlining the Many Beneficiaries of Evidence Week

June 23, 2018 1398

There is regularly talk of revolutions in the worlds of research methods, data analytics and policy evidence. We now have national strategies to build smart cities, complex algorithms for healthcare provision, real-time environmental monitoring and sources of data that decision-makers of the 1990s could not have dreamed of.

Tracey-Brown

Tracey Brown has been the director of Sense about Science since 2002.

Have you ever thought about where this leaves parliaments – the bodies of people who are supposed to represent us and scrutinize the use of government powers? Parliaments the world over are charged with calling policy to account and developing new legislation on issues as far apart as rented housing and off-shore fisheries, the effects of new taxation or rules on adoption. To do this they increasingly have to ask searching questions of new sources of data, complex interactions and trade offs, amid an explosion of scholarly (and not so scholarly) claims.

Between elections, parliament represents our need for public reasoning and accountability. So this – the first ever Evidence Week – is a timely response to the changing demands of that role. It is about parliament relocating its activities in the information revolutions. While the House of Commons library, a co-organiser of Evidence Week, celebrates 200 years this summer, it is also offering MPs access to the cutting edge tools and analysis that bring their role well into this point in the 21st century. As colleagues at SAGE Publishing, our lead partner in the week, know well, librarians are the best navigational friends in this journey. Together, and with input across social networks and research communities, we have produced a week of punchy briefings and themed debates. Beginning with questions of quality, we move through statistics and data disaggregation, and on to assessing what works and understanding ‘wicked problems’ – those seemingly simple issues with complex origins such as air quality, obesity and homelessness.

The message of Evidence Week isn’t a simple celebration of science. It’s that insights into the uses of scientific evidence go a long way to support effective scrutiny and reasoned decisions. That matters to the public in many, many ways – as teachers, cyclists, housing officers, construction supervisors, gym instructors, helpline operators, conservationists, patients, parents – and as voters who are deciding where they stand.

This is why Evidence Week opens with a delegation of community groups from all over the UK. It is why we will finish it with a roundtable in which Ziyad Marar, president of global publishing at SAGE, will join me, along with parliamentary committee chairs, the head of the Office for National Statistics and public bodies to consider, ‘Are we asking what people want to know?’ SAGE will be publishing this as a paper to take forward the thinking of Evidence Week and as the start of a conversation about the use and understanding of research in parliament – one that we hope everyone reading this will want to be a part of.


Evidence Week

June 25-28 will see the first ever ‘Evidence Week’ in the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Activities during the week will address quality evidence, what matters and what questions we need to ask, what is most effective and how and what we need to do to support and ensure engagement at a government level. It will bring together members of Parliament, peers, parliamentary services and people from all walks of life across the UK to talk about why evidence matters. In particular, activities will highlight the role of the House of Commons Library and POST and sharing insights into the work of parliamentarians in seeking and scrutinising evidence.

The week is an initiative of Sense about Science, the House of Commons Library, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology and House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, and is in partnership with SAGE Publishing (the parent of Social Science Space).

Individual events and briefings are collaborations with community organisations, research and regulatory bodies including the Royal Statistical Society, Alliance for Useful Evidence, Institute for Government, UCL, CLOSER, Cochrane UK and the Society for Applied Microbiology.

For a full program, please click here. Parliamentary pass holders please RSVP here. Member of the public interested in participating are asked to contact hello@senseaboutscience.org


Tracey Brown OBE is the director of Sense about Science. She has written papers, periodicals and books on accountability for evidence, including Playing by the Rules, co-authored with the late science journalist Michael Hanlon.

View all posts by Tracey Brown

Related Articles

There’s Something in the Air, Part 2 – But It’s Not a Miasma
Insights
April 15, 2024

There’s Something in the Air, Part 2 – But It’s Not a Miasma

Read Now
To Better Forecast AI, We Need to Learn Where Its Money Is Pointing
Innovation
April 10, 2024

To Better Forecast AI, We Need to Learn Where Its Money Is Pointing

Read Now
A Community Call: Spotlight on Women’s Safety in the Music Industry 
Insights
March 22, 2024

A Community Call: Spotlight on Women’s Safety in the Music Industry 

Read Now
Charles V. Hamilton, 1929-2023: The Philosopher Behind ‘Black Power’
Career
March 5, 2024

Charles V. Hamilton, 1929-2023: The Philosopher Behind ‘Black Power’

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

The processes of mainstreaming and normalization of far-right politics have much to do with the mainstream itself, if not more than with the far right.

Read Now
SSRC Links with U.S. Treasury on Evaluation Projects

SSRC Links with U.S. Treasury on Evaluation Projects

Thanks to a partnership between the SSRC and the US Department of the Treasury, two new research opportunities in program evaluation – the Homeowner Assistance Fund Project and the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Project – have opened.

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Retractions are generally framed as a negative: as science not working properly, as an embarrassment for the institutions involved, or as a flaw in the peer review process. They can be all those things. But they can also be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments