Communication

What’s the Best Day to Submit an Academic Article?

April 12, 2019 3880

Calendar

In 2017 myself and Guillaume Cabanac published the results from our examination of the electronic records for over 11,000 manuscripts submitted to the British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET) between 2005 and 2014.  The data we assessed (amongst others) were the dates of the original submissions, the dates that selected papers were sent to the referees, the dates that the referees returned their reports with their recommendations (e.g., Accept, Minor revisions, Major revisions, Revise and resubmit, and Reject) and – if appropriate – the dates of resubmissions and revised manuscripts.  Inadvertently, of course, this data also disclosed the days of the week when these operations were carried out.

LSE-impact-blog-logo
This article by James Hartley originally appeared on the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog as
“Never on a Sunday! Is there a best day for submitting an article for publication?” and is reposted under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 3.0).

Our results showed that the number of submissions (N = 6130), either initial or revised, declined steadily throughout the week, with Monday being the most frequent (18 percent) and Saturdays and Sundays the least frequent (7 and 9 pecent). Unfortunately, we did not analyse at that time whether or not there were any differences between the acceptance rates for papers submitted on these different days of the week.

However, other investigators have done just this. In 2016 Marcel Ausloos and his colleagues, for instance, reported on their examination of the relationship, if any, between the days of submission and acceptance of 596 papers published by the Serbian Chemical Society in 2013-14.  These investigators found a Tuesday-Wednesday effect.  Most papers were submitted on a Wednesday but a higher proportion of the ones submitted on a Tuesday were accepted.  And, as in our own study reported above, Ausloos et al (2016) also found that the greatest proportion of rejected manuscripts were submitted on a Saturday or a Sunday.

More recently Boja et al (2018) examined the days of the week for the submissions of 178,427 accepted papers to the science journals Physica APLOS ONENature and Cell. These investigators found a day of the week effect for all four of these journals, with highly significant differences being reported between the number of successful submissions on weekdays compared with those at the weekend (approximately 17.5 percent per each week day versus approximately 6 percent at the weekend for each journal).

Some other points to consider when examining these data sets are that there might be overriding (i) seasonal effects, (ii) hemispheric effects, and (iii) specific effects that can be attributed to religious beliefs and practices in different parts of the world. There have in fact been several studies of such variables (see here for references) but there have been no clear cut findings in these studies with respect to submission dates. In 2017 Ausloos et al re-analysed their 2016 data and rejected the notion that there might be a seasonal effect – or a teaching/vacation split in their data.  Similarly, Boja et al did not find any significant effects for different seasons or different continents, although significantly more papers were submitted during the Christmas period.

So there we have it.  The authors in all of the studies reported above find a similar finding.  This is to the effect that papers submitted at weekends are less successful than papers submitted during the week and there are few, if any, seasonal effects.  Just why this should be so is not clear.  But I for one, will submit this paper to the LSE Blog on a Tuesday…


James Hartley is emeritus professor in the School of Psychology at Keele University, UK. The interrelated themes of his research have been concerned with student learning, the design of instructional text, and academic writing, and he has published widely in each of these areas, including the 2008 book Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook. He is a fellow of the American Psychological Association and the British Psychological Society, and serves on the editorial boards of five academic journals. Hartley has an h index of 47.

View all posts by James Hartley

Related Articles

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change
Bookshelf
March 29, 2024

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?
Communication
February 27, 2024

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases
Communication
February 1, 2024

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Read Now
Safiya Noble on Search Engines
Social Science Bites
January 8, 2024

Safiya Noble on Search Engines

Read Now
Did Turing Miss the Point? Should He Have Thought of the Limerick Test?

Did Turing Miss the Point? Should He Have Thought of the Limerick Test?

David Canter is horrified by the power of readily available large language technology.

Read Now
The Silver Lining in Bulk Retractions

The Silver Lining in Bulk Retractions

This is the opening from a longer post by Adya Misra, the research integrity and inclusion manager at Social Science Space’s parent, Sage. The full post, which addresses the hows and the whys of bulk retractions in Sage’s academic journals, appears at Retraction Watch.

Read Now
Fake News, Misinformation Focus of New Microsite

Fake News, Misinformation Focus of New Microsite

A new Information Literacy Microsite from sage can be your new home for pressing research on the digital age and the ways to combat mis-, dis-, and misinformation.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments