Communication

What’s the Best Day to Submit an Academic Article?

April 12, 2019 4514

Calendar

In 2017 myself and Guillaume Cabanac published the results from our examination of the electronic records for over 11,000 manuscripts submitted to the British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET) between 2005 and 2014.  The data we assessed (amongst others) were the dates of the original submissions, the dates that selected papers were sent to the referees, the dates that the referees returned their reports with their recommendations (e.g., Accept, Minor revisions, Major revisions, Revise and resubmit, and Reject) and – if appropriate – the dates of resubmissions and revised manuscripts.  Inadvertently, of course, this data also disclosed the days of the week when these operations were carried out.

LSE-impact-blog-logo
This article by James Hartley originally appeared on the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog as
“Never on a Sunday! Is there a best day for submitting an article for publication?” and is reposted under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 3.0).

Our results showed that the number of submissions (N = 6130), either initial or revised, declined steadily throughout the week, with Monday being the most frequent (18 percent) and Saturdays and Sundays the least frequent (7 and 9 pecent). Unfortunately, we did not analyse at that time whether or not there were any differences between the acceptance rates for papers submitted on these different days of the week.

However, other investigators have done just this. In 2016 Marcel Ausloos and his colleagues, for instance, reported on their examination of the relationship, if any, between the days of submission and acceptance of 596 papers published by the Serbian Chemical Society in 2013-14.  These investigators found a Tuesday-Wednesday effect.  Most papers were submitted on a Wednesday but a higher proportion of the ones submitted on a Tuesday were accepted.  And, as in our own study reported above, Ausloos et al (2016) also found that the greatest proportion of rejected manuscripts were submitted on a Saturday or a Sunday.

More recently Boja et al (2018) examined the days of the week for the submissions of 178,427 accepted papers to the science journals Physica APLOS ONENature and Cell. These investigators found a day of the week effect for all four of these journals, with highly significant differences being reported between the number of successful submissions on weekdays compared with those at the weekend (approximately 17.5 percent per each week day versus approximately 6 percent at the weekend for each journal).

Some other points to consider when examining these data sets are that there might be overriding (i) seasonal effects, (ii) hemispheric effects, and (iii) specific effects that can be attributed to religious beliefs and practices in different parts of the world. There have in fact been several studies of such variables (see here for references) but there have been no clear cut findings in these studies with respect to submission dates. In 2017 Ausloos et al re-analysed their 2016 data and rejected the notion that there might be a seasonal effect – or a teaching/vacation split in their data.  Similarly, Boja et al did not find any significant effects for different seasons or different continents, although significantly more papers were submitted during the Christmas period.

So there we have it.  The authors in all of the studies reported above find a similar finding.  This is to the effect that papers submitted at weekends are less successful than papers submitted during the week and there are few, if any, seasonal effects.  Just why this should be so is not clear.  But I for one, will submit this paper to the LSE Blog on a Tuesday…


James Hartley is emeritus professor in the School of Psychology at Keele University, UK. The interrelated themes of his research have been concerned with student learning, the design of instructional text, and academic writing, and he has published widely in each of these areas, including the 2008 book Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook. He is a fellow of the American Psychological Association and the British Psychological Society, and serves on the editorial boards of five academic journals. Hartley has an h index of 47.

View all posts by James Hartley

Related Articles

Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 
Bookshelf
September 25, 2024

Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 

Read Now
Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI
International Debate
September 11, 2024

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

Read Now
Partnership Marks Milestone in Advancing Black Scholarship 
Communication
September 10, 2024

Partnership Marks Milestone in Advancing Black Scholarship 

Read Now
Seventh Edition of ‘The Evidence’: The Rise of Unsafe Abortions after Roe v Wade 
Bookshelf
August 30, 2024

Seventh Edition of ‘The Evidence’: The Rise of Unsafe Abortions after Roe v Wade 

Read Now
Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?

Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?

The origin of the phrase “publish or perish” has been intriguing since this question was first raised by Eugene Garfield in 1996. Vladimir Moskovkinl talks about the evolution of the meaning of this phrase and shows the earliest use known at this point.

Read Now
Sixth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: We Need a New Approach to Preventing Sexual Violence

Sixth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: We Need a New Approach to Preventing Sexual Violence

In this month’s installment of The Evidence newsletter, journalist Josephine Lethbridge explores recent research into sexual violence prevention programs and interviews experts […]

Read Now
Stop Buying Cobras: Halting the Rise of Fake Academic Papers

Stop Buying Cobras: Halting the Rise of Fake Academic Papers

It is estimated that all journals, irrespective of discipline, experience a steeply rising number of fake paper submissions. Currently, the rate is about 2 percent. That may sound small. But, given the large and growing amount of scholarly publications it means that a lot of fake papers are published. Each of these can seriously damage patients, society or nature when applied in practice.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments