News

Minerva Initiative Seems Likely to Avoid Untimely Death

July 10, 2020 3005

In early February, the proposed U.S. government budget for the 2021 fiscal year featured sizable funding cuts to many federally funded social science research programs. For one example, the proposed budget saw a 9 percent decline in funding for the National Science Foundation’s Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences Directorate.

Among the many research-program-related-casualties, the budget had been slated to eliminate the national security-focused Minerva Initiative, self-described as a program which “supports social science research aimed at improving [the United States’] basic understanding of security, broadly defined.”

Although the White House does not have the power to construct the ultimate budget — the Constitution requires that spending bills originate in the House of Representatives — the White House’s proposal was seen as an indication of the Trump administration’s budgeting priorities and a guiding force for the Congress, who do have the ultimate power to construct and finalize the yearly budget.

Supported primarily under the Department of Defense’s (DoD) budget, the goal of the Minerva Initiative is “to improve the DoD’s basic understanding of the social, cultural, behavioral, and political forces that shape regions of the world of strategic importance to the U.S.”

The initiative received $11.4 million in funding for FY2020. Although small, the number nonetheless represents an embrace of the value of social science for the purposes of national security, international comprehension, and beyond.

Despite the White House’s proposed defunding of the Minerva, committees in both the Senate and the House have recently drafted forms of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2021 that provide more funding — $17 million, or just shy of a 50 percent increase — to the program. The NDAA is a series of annually drafted federal laws that lay out the budget and its respective expenditures for the U.S. Department of Defense, and is considered a “must-pass” bill, according to an analysis from the Consortium of Social Science Associations.

The House’s Armed Services Committee passed its version of the bill on July 1, while the Senate’s Armed Services Committee heard some testimony on its own version of NDAA before a July 2 recess and will continue hearing testimony later this month. COSSA notes that “both bills would require that DOD report back on how it plans to continue to cultivate the social sciences within the Department.” A single bill reconciling both versions will emerge before heading to the president’s desk for signature.

To see some of the intellectual fruits that the Minerva Initiative has given society, check out the Minerva Initiative’s News Page, where the articles of awardees are displayed. Some recent articles deal with the social science behind the children of ISIS fighters, the ability of machine learning to help with COVID-19 in West Africa, and terror and crime in Russia. The Minerva Initiative also lists what its researchers are doing to help combat and research COVID-19.

Augustus Wachbrit (or, if you’re intimidated by his three-syllable name, Gus) is the Social Science Communications Intern at SAGE Publishing. He assists in the creation, curation, revision, and distribution of various forms of written content primarily for Social Science Space and Method Space. He is studying Philosophy and English at California Lutheran University, where he is a research fellow and department assistant. If you’re likely to find him anywhere, he’ll be studying from a textbook, writing (either academically or creatively), exercising, or defying all odds and doing all these things at once.

View all posts by Gus Wachbrit

Related Articles

Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series
News
February 21, 2024

Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series

Read Now
A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science
Interview
February 14, 2024

A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science

Read Now
Addressing the United Kingdom’s Lack of Black Scholars
Higher Education Reform
February 8, 2024

Addressing the United Kingdom’s Lack of Black Scholars

Read Now
SSRC Links with U.S. Treasury on Evaluation Projects
Announcements
February 1, 2024

SSRC Links with U.S. Treasury on Evaluation Projects

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Retractions are generally framed as a negative: as science not working properly, as an embarrassment for the institutions involved, or as a flaw in the peer review process. They can be all those things. But they can also be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect.

Read Now
Using Forensic Anthropology to Identify the Unknown Dead

Using Forensic Anthropology to Identify the Unknown Dead

Anthropology is the holistic study of human culture, environment and biology across time and space. Biological anthropology focuses on the physiological aspects of people and our nonhuman primate relatives. Forensic anthropology is a further subspecialty that analyzes skeletal remains of the recently deceased within a legal setting.

Read Now
Connecting Legislators and Researchers, Leads to Policies Based on Scientific Evidence

Connecting Legislators and Researchers, Leads to Policies Based on Scientific Evidence

The author’s team is developing ways to connect policymakers with university-based researchers – and studying what happens when these academics become the trusted sources, rather than those with special interests who stand to gain financially from various initiatives.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments