Communication

Semantic Metadata and Evidence-Based Policy Assessment

January 25, 2011 2026

An increasingly wide range of research resources is being placed online, and the traditional journal article is being supplemented with access to data sets, interview transcripts, and survey results. While these resources are of use to other researchers, the large quantity of resources available makes the management of resources an increasingly important subject. One solution to the problem of potential information overload is the adoption of metadata and ontologies to not only describe the resources but the concepts within the resources and the relationships between them. In their 2009 article, e-Social Science and Evidence-Based Policy Assessment, Edwards et al. detail the process of creating metadata and ontologies to support evidence-based policy assessment. They demonstrate not only the complexities of attempting to conceptualise the necessary components of social science resources, but the importance of the user-interface, and how web 2.0 and semantic technologies can be combined to create community driven metadata.

Evidence-based policy assessment is increasingly important as policy-makers move away from opinion-based decision making, and instead require that policy is grounded in research that provides sufficient evidence to support any policy recommendations and an audit trail that allows policy-makers to understand how conclusions were reached. Researchers need to be able to not only discover available resources, but the provenance of those resources, i.e. how the data was created and its context.

There are various difficulties in creating a framework for the management of evidence, including the range of resources available and the wide variety of both quantitative and qualitative research methods (as well as mixed methods) that may have been adopted in the research process. The creation of a provenance model is not easily done by the analysis of data sets alone, but by interviewing social science researchers, ontologies can be created that capture the necessary metadata to provide the provenance record.

The ability of an ontology to capture the necessary metadata is not enough on its own, an appropriate user interface for the creation of the metadata is equally important if researchers are not only going to go through the inconvenience of creating the metadata, but create useful metadata. The ourSpaces virtual research environment has been designed to support researchers conducting evidence-based policy research, encouraging users to describe the resources themselves through a novel natural language interface that also shows a tag cloud of other terms that have been used within particular fields to create community driven metadata.

The creation of ontologies and metadata to describe resources and their provenance is not only important in policy-related research, but in aiding scientists in the management of resources in all disciplines, including those conducting interdisciplinary research which is likely to introduce new complexities. Importantly, the provenance concept has the potential to encourage greater reflection at all stages of the research process, and greater methodological rigor.

Edwards, P. et al. (2009) e-Social Science and Evidence-Based Policy Assessment: challenges and solutions. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 553-568.

Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Related Articles

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal
Artificial Intelligence
March 10, 2026

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Read Now
Thinking Qualitatively: Making a Difference
Event
March 10, 2026

Thinking Qualitatively: Making a Difference

Read Now
Measuring What Matters: Why Academic Pathways Need Shared Evidence, Not Just Good Intentions 
Infrastructure
February 17, 2026

Measuring What Matters: Why Academic Pathways Need Shared Evidence, Not Just Good Intentions 

Read Now
Andrea Medina-Smith on Making Research Data More FAIR
Industry
February 9, 2026

Andrea Medina-Smith on Making Research Data More FAIR

Read Now
After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

Around the world, universities are in crisis. Some argue that we’re witnessing the slow collapse of the system as we’ve known it—whether […]

Read Now
A Status Check on Hallucinated Case Law Incidents

A Status Check on Hallucinated Case Law Incidents

In September 2025, The Guardian reported about a lawyer in Australia having faced sanctions due to false citations. These citations were not […]

Read Now
Scientists Should Keep in Mind It’s Called the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’ for a Reason

Scientists Should Keep in Mind It’s Called the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’ for a Reason

People often see science as a world apart: cool, rational and untouched by persuasion or performance. In this view, scientists simply discover […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments