International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 1531

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line
Artificial Intelligence
December 10, 2025

An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line

Read Now
Stop the Rot, Fight the Malaise and Reclaim the Void!
Higher Education Reform
December 5, 2025

Stop the Rot, Fight the Malaise and Reclaim the Void!

Read Now
Less Academic Freedom Will Mean Fewer Collaborative Breakthroughs
News
November 20, 2025

Less Academic Freedom Will Mean Fewer Collaborative Breakthroughs

Read Now
Vaccination: A Child’s Right?
Public Policy
November 17, 2025

Vaccination: A Child’s Right?

Read Now
Why Your DeFi Portfolio Needs Better Guardrails — and How a Multi-Chain Wallet Can Help

Why Your DeFi Portfolio Needs Better Guardrails — and How a Multi-Chain Wallet Can Help

Whoa! I kept bumping into the same messy problem. Short version: users chase yields across chains and then wake up to drained […]

Read Now
Anna Harvey Stepping Down as SSRC President

Anna Harvey Stepping Down as SSRC President

Political scientist Anna Harvey will leave her role as president of the Social Science Research Council on June 30, the New York […]

Read Now
The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education

The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education

Perhaps because college students are generally considered adults, and college and university campuses and classrooms have long been viewed as places to […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments