International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 2006

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

Lumivero Report: Qualitative Researchers Adopting AI, But Lack Confidence In It
Artificial Intelligence
October 22, 2026

Lumivero Report: Qualitative Researchers Adopting AI, But Lack Confidence In It

Read Now
What We Miss When We Study Public Trust with Surveys Alone
Artificial Intelligence
October 14, 2026

What We Miss When We Study Public Trust with Surveys Alone

Read Now
Whales: Giants of the Ocean
News
October 6, 2026

Whales: Giants of the Ocean

Read Now
Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality
International Debate
October 1, 2026

Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality

Read Now
Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award

Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award

“The Great Acceleration” is a concept in the scholarship over climate change that highlights the correlation between extreme human economic activity and […]

Read Now
Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated

Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated

“Once again the season of the anti-sociologists is upon us…[a]curious admixture of illogic and sentiment…makes up the creed and canons of anti-sociology.” […]

Read Now
Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic

Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic

Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar, who just last month took the reins of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted