International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 1521

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

Less Academic Freedom Will Mean Fewer Collaborative Breakthroughs
News
November 20, 2025

Less Academic Freedom Will Mean Fewer Collaborative Breakthroughs

Read Now
Vaccination: A Child’s Right?
Public Policy
November 17, 2025

Vaccination: A Child’s Right?

Read Now
Anna Harvey Stepping Down as SSRC President
Infrastructure
June 18, 2025

Anna Harvey Stepping Down as SSRC President

Read Now
The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education
Ethics
May 26, 2025

The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education

Read Now
Pope Francis, Human Dignity, and the Right to Stay, Migrate and Return

Pope Francis, Human Dignity, and the Right to Stay, Migrate and Return

Pope Francis devoted his Message for World Day of Migrants and Refugees in 2023 to the “right” or “freedom” to stay or […]

Read Now
Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase

Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase

Are you a researcher with an idea that could help solve one of today’s most pressing problems? A conference in Dubai this […]

Read Now
The Academy and the Authoritarian: Stories from the 20th Century

The Academy and the Authoritarian: Stories from the 20th Century

Many American universities, widely seen globally as beacons of academic integrity and free speech, are giving in to demands from the Trump […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments