International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 1893

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

Spinbara : inscription, première connexion et réglages utiles
News
September 3, 2026

Spinbara : inscription, première connexion et réglages utiles

Read Now
Reliable Pokies Review For Rainbet New Zealand: Detailed Overview
News
September 3, 2026

Reliable Pokies Review For Rainbet New Zealand: Detailed Overview

Read Now
Guide complet de Winbeatz casino pour les joueurs en France : tournois et missions
News
September 1, 2026

Guide complet de Winbeatz casino pour les joueurs en France : tournois et missions

Read Now
Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award
Interdisciplinarity
August 18, 2026

Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award

Read Now
Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated

Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated

“Once again the season of the anti-sociologists is upon us…[a]curious admixture of illogic and sentiment…makes up the creed and canons of anti-sociology.” […]

Read Now
Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic

Cuéllar Leaving Newly Begun Post at CASBS for Global Policy Role at Anthropic

Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar, who just last month took the reins of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford […]

Read Now
Quick Insight: David Edmonds on Podcasting for Academe

Quick Insight: David Edmonds on Podcasting for Academe

A little over 20 years ago, some 8,000 podcasts joined the iTunes platform, according to Beamly. While not all podcasts, that figure […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted