Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?
The landscape of academic grant funding is notoriously competitive and plagued by lengthy, bureaucratic processes, exacerbated by difficulties in finding willing reviewers. Distributed […]
“Challenges for Institutional Theory”, by Roy Suddaby, University of Alberta, was the most frequently read article in the Journal of Management Inquiry […]
“Effects of Positive Practices on Organizational Effectiveness“, by Kim Cameron, Margaret Calarco, both of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Carlos Mora, […]
The National Science Foundation’s director, Subra Suresh, recently met with various scientific societies and universities to discuss the future of the NSF […]
“Understanding the Motivational Contingencies of Team Leadership”, by D. Scott DeRue, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Christopher M. Barnes, U.S Military Academy […]
Inevitably, over time, there are peaks and troughs within the fortunes of different social science disciplines depending on how closely they find […]
Visit the Forum to join the discussion on absurd decisions by ethics committees – share your best (or worst) examples.
Does the Tiger Mother get it right? While some view Asian-Americans as pushy, stressing their children into exceptional achievement, research doesn’t bear […]
A new report today from the Centre for Social Justice, a UK think-tank, is highly critical of the way that successive governments […]