Business and Management INK

Team Leadership

January 26, 2011 2479

Understanding the Motivational Contingencies of Team Leadership”, by D. Scott DeRue, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Christopher M. Barnes, U.S Military Academy at West Point, New York, and Frederick P. Morgeson, Michigan State University, East Lansing, was the most frequently read article in Small Group Research in 2010. D. Scott DeRue has provided a personal perspective on the article.

Team leaders can take a directive approach where they focus on setting the team’s direction, assigning goals, settings expectations, providing task-relevant instructions, setting timelines, and giving feedback when performance problems arise. Alternatively, team leaders can take a more coaching-oriented approach where they focus on helping team members learn to operate on their own without directly intervening in or managing the team’s work processes. Interestingly, prior research suggests that both of these team leadership approaches can be effective. Our study establishes the conditions under which each of these team leadership approaches is more or less effective.

We conducted this study because we were curious about why these divergent approaches to team leadership can be equally effective across different teams. Indeed, we learned that a directive approach was more successful when team members were confident in their abilities. Having observed many of these teams in action, it seemed to us that a directive approach to leadership was harnessing the energy that confident team members had and pointing that energy and effort in directions that led to higher team performance. At the same time, we also learned that coaching leaders can be even more effective than directive leaders, but only when those individuals are charismatic. We expect people are finding this article particularly interesting because it shows that divergent styles of team leadership are more or less effective depending on both leader and follower characteristics – a finding that really highlights the contingent nature of leadership in teams.

 Bookmark and Share

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

Using Intelligent Self-Limitation to Explore the Distinction Between Environment and Umwelt
Business and Management INK
December 6, 2024

Using Intelligent Self-Limitation to Explore the Distinction Between Environment and Umwelt

Read Now
The Authors of ‘Artificial Intelligence and Work’ on Future Risk
Innovation
December 4, 2024

The Authors of ‘Artificial Intelligence and Work’ on Future Risk

Read Now
From Conflict to Peace: Reflecting on the Leadership of John Hume in Northern Ireland
Business and Management INK
December 3, 2024

From Conflict to Peace: Reflecting on the Leadership of John Hume in Northern Ireland

Read Now
The End of Meaningful CSR?
Business and Management INK
November 22, 2024

The End of Meaningful CSR?

Read Now
Boards and Internationalization Speed

Boards and Internationalization Speed

This article aims to explore how the boards of international new ventures (INVs) develop throughout the internationalisation and growth phases of the firm.

Read Now
How Managers Can Enhance Trust

How Managers Can Enhance Trust

How to stimulate interpersonal trust in organizations? How can performance management contribute to trust? And, can other types of management control also […]

Read Now
The Role of Place in Sustainability

The Role of Place in Sustainability

In this article, co-authors Arno Kourula, Panikos Georgallis, Irene Henriques, and Johanna Mair reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Introduction to the Special Issue […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments