Business and Management INK

Cracking the Ethics Code

September 18, 2012 1117

As organizations’ ethical failures continue to pile up in the news headlines, there is no better moment to get a firm grasp on how ethical systems work and how they can be more successfully managed. Group & Organization Management has published an up-close, qualitative study of cadets at West Point—the nation’s oldest military service academy, with its two-centuries-old Honor Code—to discover the complex competing forces, or tensions, at work in these systems, concluding that both scholars and practitioners may find this information useful in developing a code of ethics that works. Take a look at just one example from the study:

[W]e interviewed a newly minted Army major who just arrived to teach Mathematics at the Academy. During an emotional portion of the interview, he admitted to witnessing cadets cheat back when he was a cadet. Rather than bring it to the attention of the Honor board, he chose to remain silent. He said,

It wasn’t so much about them, it was more about me [with emphasis]. I wanted to be liked. Wanted to be popular. I guess what I wanted, in a tough environment like this [West Point] is that I just wanted to be accepted. If I told on them, I’d lose all of that.

 As evidenced by this sentiment, reconciliation of these competing forces is not always successful. At other times, we found this cognitive and emotional struggle realized.

Click here to read the full article, “Reconciling Competing Tensions in Ethical Systems: Lessons From the United States Military Academy at West Point,” published by Evan H. Offstein of Frostburg State University, Ronald L. Dufresne of Saint Joseph’s University, and J. Stephen Childers, Jr. of Radford University on September 13, 2012 in Group & Organization Management. To learn more about the journal, please follow this link.

Are you interested in receiving email alerts about the latest management and organization theory research? Then click here!

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory
Business and Management INK
July 25, 2024

We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory

Read Now
Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events
Business and Management INK
July 23, 2024

Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events

Read Now
Funny or Functional: Customer Engagement in Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Services
Business and Management INK
July 22, 2024

Funny or Functional: Customer Engagement in Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Services

Read Now
‘Push, Pull, Dance’: Public Health Procurement – Saving Lives and Preventing Harm
Business and Management INK
July 18, 2024

‘Push, Pull, Dance’: Public Health Procurement – Saving Lives and Preventing Harm

Read Now
Leading Boards in Chaos and Uncertainty? Have an Enlightened Approach

Leading Boards in Chaos and Uncertainty? Have an Enlightened Approach

This article addresses the pivotal question of what sets well-governed companies apart from those jeopardizing stakeholders’ wealth and well-being, and argues that the key to sustainability and effective governance lies in the presence of an enlightened chair.

Read Now
Studying Leadership Coaching in the Workplace

Studying Leadership Coaching in the Workplace

Tatiana Bachkirova and Peter Jackson reflect on coaching and other factors that led to the publishing of their research article, “What do leaders really want to learn in a workplace? A study of the shifting agendas of leadership coaching,”

Read Now
Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

The retraction of academic papers often functions as an indictment against a researcher’s reputation. Tim Kersjes argues that for retractions to function as an effective corrective to the scholarly record, they need shed this punitive reputation.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kath

As the snippet with the army major above shows having the ‘group mentality’ is a really important element of all this…I think that, unfortunately, most people have a fairly large moral black spot when it comes to accepting unethical behaviour by members of the group they identify themselves with…you can really see this in international finance.