Business and Management INK

How Thinking Styles Influence Team Innovation

September 6, 2012 974

Dr. Corinne Post, Lehigh University

Editor’s note: We are pleased to welcome Dr. Corinne Post, Assistant Professor of Management at Lehigh University. Dr. Post, whose research interests include diversity management, performance, and innovation, published “Deep-Level Team Composition and Innovation: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Cooperative Learning” on August 30, 2012 in Group & Organization Management.

***

There has been a lot of attention on how the diversity of knowledge held among team members may influence a team’s capacity to innovate. I argue that the way team members think—that is, the ways in which they process information—also influence a team’s ability to innovate (above and beyond the variety of knowledge held by team members.)

Findings from a National Science Foundation (NSF) supported study, using a sample of 83 natural innovation teams, support my argument. The results of the study, to be published in Group & Organization Management later this year, show that thinking styles indirectly influence team innovation by shaping teams’ interpersonal dynamics. Sequential, analytical thinking decreases team innovation by inhibiting psychological safety, while holistic, connective thinking improves team innovation by facilitating cooperative learning among members.

The findings from this study are especially noteworthy because they show that the relationship between team members’ cognitive styles and team innovation is independent from the relationship between knowledge variety and innovation. Hence, thinking styles should be considered an important area of investigation, distinct from the work on informational diversity, in further efforts to unpack the team composition / team performance puzzle.

Managers, who are often encouraged to compose teams with diverse task-relevant experts in order to put knowledge diversity at the service of innovation, should also consider members’ thinking styles when putting together innovation teams because the pooled cognitive styles of members appear to influence team innovation above and beyond the functional variety represented by team members.

Follow this link to read Dr. Post’s article in Group & Organization Management. Would you like to keep up with the latest research on this topic? Click here to sign up for customizable e-alerts!

 

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

Using Ethnography to Explore Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities
Business and Management INK
September 6, 2024

Using Ethnography to Explore Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities

Read Now
2024 Henry and Bryna David Lecture: K-12 Education in the Age of AI
Event
September 5, 2024

2024 Henry and Bryna David Lecture: K-12 Education in the Age of AI

Read Now
The Future of Business is Interdisciplinary 
Interdisciplinarity
September 5, 2024

The Future of Business is Interdisciplinary 

Read Now
The Co-Creation Edge in Marketing Education
Business and Management INK
August 19, 2024

The Co-Creation Edge in Marketing Education

Read Now
Book Review: Exploring, Understanding, and Managing Organizational Paradoxes

Book Review: Exploring, Understanding, and Managing Organizational Paradoxes

In this article, V Kalyani provides brief insights into her recently published book review, entitled “Book Review: Organizational Paradox,” published in Management Communication […]

Read Now
Enhancing Cultural Intelligence in Organizations: A Strategic Approach

Enhancing Cultural Intelligence in Organizations: A Strategic Approach

In this blog post, co-authors Alexey Semenov and Arilova Randrianasolo reflect on their interest in the intersection between organization and cultural intelligence. This […]

Read Now
Machine Learning Research Requires Smaller Sample Sizes than Previously Thought

Machine Learning Research Requires Smaller Sample Sizes than Previously Thought

In this post, authors Louis Hickman, Josh Liff, Caleb Rottman, and Charles Calderwood outline the inspiration behind their recently published academic paper, […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments