PIBBS

Negotiating Deals and Settling Conflict Benefit Both Sides PIBBS
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, right, meets with Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif early in negotiations over Iran's nuclear program.

Negotiating Deals and Settling Conflict Benefit Both Sides

April 3, 2015 2222

Kerry and Zarif meet on Iran's nuclear program

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, right, meets with Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif early in negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

It has happened repeatedly throughout history: two or more countries or ethnic groups fundamentally disagree and war breaks out.

Or a marriage ends and the emotional and financial toll drags on for years.  And then there are the hostile corporate takeovers, which not only reduce shareholder wealth but stir bad feelings all around.

As new research in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences points out, dispute settlement does not have to proceed and end badly.

In fact, decades of research in social psychology has shown that by regulating conflict constructively parties can not only avoid unpleasant and costly conflicts but settle disputes in ways that mutually benefit both sides, certainly the hope of all sides in the current breakthrough over a Iranian nuclear deal.

PIBBS cover

The Federation of Associations in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, or FABBS, with SAGE, the parent of Social Science Space, publishes the journal Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. This annual journal features research findings in the sciences of mind, brain, and behavior that are applicable to nearly every area of public policy. The first issue comprises 33 articles in social and personality psychology focused on topics including health, education, justice, the environment, and inequality.

This constructive strategy—known as negotiation, or problem solving—cannot be unilateral, and it is the only form of dispute resolution that not only creates value but also benefits both sides.

Personality and Negotiation

Sometimes negotiation arises when one side realizes it can’t win, explains Carsten K.W. De Dreu, author of “Negotiating Deals and Settling Conflict Can Create Value for Both Sides.”

Negotiation prevailed when the Irish Republican Army and British government negotiated an end to decades of bloodshed and terrorist attacks in Northern Ireland.

Or it may arise to avoid catastrophe, such as when the United States and what was then the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics launched intensified trade negotiations to end severe drought in the USSR.

Negotiation is not easy, De Dreu states. “There is room for cheating and deception, and thus for suspicion and distrust.”

Adding to the challenge is the mentally taxing nature of negotiation.  People often try to simplify the issues by making assumptions and setting limits on what they might consider a gain or loss.  De Dreu uses the term naïve realism to describe negotiators who fail to recognize other points of view and frame questions that could support only their own hypotheses.

Greed and other barriers to negotiation can be counteracted by a concept he calls cooperative motivation: the desire to reach an agreement that also accommodates the other side.  People with personality traits that are heavy on “agreeableness” and “need for affiliation” typically are more inclined to make concessions to benefit the other side.

Low-Pressure Situations

Showing concern for the other party does not necessarily require ignoring self-interest, De Dreu states. But it does require putting in the time to fully understand the issues.

In short, there are no short cuts. As De Dreu explains, negotiators need to fully understand the issues as well as the other party’s needs and interests. They also should be free to negotiate without the weight of “constituents”—colleagues, spouses, friends, etc.—looking over their shoulder. Negotiators often will assume these constituents want them to be competitive.

As the paper states: “Value creation benefits from benign environments.”

In low-pressure situations, negotiators are free to focus on long-term perspectives and match their own interests with those of the other party. In the end, both sides make concessions, but both sides also win.


Jennifer Anderson is a professional journalist specializing in health and science. She can be reached at jennifer_anderson@verizon.net

View all posts by Jennifer Anderson

Related Articles

Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions
Research
October 10, 2024

Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions

Read Now
Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work
Social Science Bites
July 1, 2024

Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work

Read Now
How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment
Insights
June 14, 2024

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Read Now
How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves
Ethics
June 4, 2024

How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves

Read Now
Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Drawing on a study of Crossref DOI data, Martin Eve finds evidence to suggest that the current standard of digital preservation could fall worryingly short of ensuring persistent accurate record of scholarly works.

Read Now
Analyzing the Impact: Social Media and Mental Health 

Analyzing the Impact: Social Media and Mental Health 

The social and behavioral sciences supply evidence-based research that enables us to make sense of the shifting online landscape pertaining to mental health. We’ll explore three freely accessible articles (listed below) that give us a fuller picture on how TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and online forums affect mental health. 

Read Now
New Fellowship for Community-Led Development Research of Latin America and the Caribbean Now Open

New Fellowship for Community-Led Development Research of Latin America and the Caribbean Now Open

Thanks to a collaboration between the Inter-American Foundation (IAF) and the Social Science Research Council (SSRC), applications are now being accepted for […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments