Research Ethics

Lessons from the LaCour Retraction
Communication
June 17, 2015

Lessons from the LaCour Retraction

Read Now
The Tragedy of the (Over-Surveyed) Commons
Research Ethics
June 10, 2015

The Tragedy of the (Over-Surveyed) Commons

Read Now
The Cultural Roots of the Latest Big Retraction
Research Ethics
May 29, 2015

The Cultural Roots of the Latest Big Retraction

Read Now
Can Transparency Equal Trust in Science’s Crisis of Credibility?
International Debate
April 8, 2015

Can Transparency Equal Trust in Science’s Crisis of Credibility?

Read Now
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, Consider Research Ethics

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, Consider Research Ethics

Imagine an ethics review system where the researcher’s proposal is read by an ‘ethics jury’ of four to six researchers drawn, as in legal juries, from the academic population at large, suggests Australia’s Gigi Foster.

Read Now
Taking a Stick to Ethics Boards

Taking a Stick to Ethics Boards

Writing about her experiences in Australia, Gigi Foster wonders if ethics boards are more interested in ticking the necessary boxes and not upholding the standards that supposedly underlie the boards’ existence.

Read Now
A Primer on Plagiarism and Other Publishing Sins

A Primer on Plagiarism and Other Publishing Sins

High-quality scientific literature is the cornerstone of scientific progress and is highly regarded by academia. However, Ritesh G. Menezes and his colleagues write in the Medico-Legal Journal, scientific literature is often marred by plagiarism, data fabrication and falsification, redundant publication and illegitimate authorship.

Read Now
When Chasing Prestige Becomes the Prize

When Chasing Prestige Becomes the Prize

A survey by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics suggests that researchers appreciate the benefits of competition but also fear how it can emphasize prestige over quality

Read Now
Colin Firth: Author, Actually

Colin Firth: Author, Actually

Authorship of an article seems like it ought to be straightforward, but of course it’s not. Even with greater scrutiny, abuse of the process — both adding the wrong people and subtracting the right ones — continues.

Read Now
We All Have a Dog in the Fight When Researchers Lie

We All Have a Dog in the Fight When Researchers Lie

Looking specifically at Australia, the author of the book on research integrity wonders how rampant plagiarizing and fabricating may be among researchers.

Read Now
Mission Possible: Be an Ethical Social Scientist

Mission Possible: Be an Ethical Social Scientist

The author of a book on research ethics for social scientists suggests that issues such as antagonism with university review boards and new complexities introduced by Big Data can make integrity a sometime elusive quality.

Read Now
A Primer for the Public: 10 Tips for Interpreting Research

A Primer for the Public: 10 Tips for Interpreting Research

We want decisions to be based on data and evidence and not ideology or gut feelings. But being presented with research results only starts the process of understanding what to draw from it.

Read Now
[mailpoet_form id="1"]