Census

A Shortened Census Count Hurts Communities of Color

September 14, 2020 2493
Although the Census Bureau itself had a plan for reaching many communities of color in the United States, facts on the ground will hamper that attempt.

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Census Bureau is having a harder time than in the past counting all Americans, and is now saying its workers will spend less time trying to count everyone.

In August, the Trump administration announced the plan to end the 2020 Census count a month earlyon Sept. 30 instead of Oct. 31. With about a month left before that new end date, fewer than two-thirds of U.S. households have been counted so far.

The result will be that the census will count fewer Black Americans, Indigenous peoples, Asian Americans and Americans of Hispanic or Latino origin than actually live in the U.S. That will mean less public money for essential services in their communities, and less representation by elected officials at the state and federal levels.

An effort to find everyone

Some people – including people of color, poorer people, rural residents and people who are not U.S. citizens – are less likely to respond to the census. In part, that’s because they have less convenient access to the mail, telephone and online services needed to respond to the survey.

The Conversation logo
This article by Aggie Yellow Horse originally appeared on The Conversation, a Social Science Space partner site, under the title “Shortened census count will hurt communities of color”.

In addition, some communities distrust the system. Among Japanese Americans, that distrust is because they recall how census data was used to round up Japanese Americans for internment during World War II.

The Census Bureau starts the census by asking Americans to respond themselves. But for those who don’t respond, there is a second phase of counting, in which census workers fan out across the country to knock on doors and help people include themselves in the national count.

For 2020, this second phase was originally planned to begin on May 13, but the pandemic delayed its start until Aug. 9. With the advanced end date, there will be only 52 days to count the residents of more than one-third of all the estimated 120 million households in the U.S. In 2010, the in-person follow-up effort had 71 days to cover a smaller share of American households.

Missing people of color

Even before the delayed beginning and the shortening of the second phase, the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, projected that the census results would systematically undercount racial minorities and people of Hispanic or Latino origin.

All communities of color were projected to be underrepresented in the count – meaning the Census Bureau would report fewer people of that racial or ethnic background than actually live in the U.S. The biggest undercount projection was for Black Americans: The Urban Institute projected the census would fail to count 3.2 percent, or more than 1.5 million. The census was expected to miss more than 1.7 million people of Hispanic and Latino origin, 2.8 percent of their real total. More than 1 in 100 people of Alaska Native or American Indian background would not be counted, and a similar share of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.

But these detailed estimates of how many people the census might miss do not make it easier to somehow correct the count. The Census Bureau does extensive work to account for errors and missing people, but only after looking at the entire response and conducting additional research. Complete census data also includes people’s ages, genders, whether they own or rent their homes and whether they have other racial or ethnic backgrounds. The smaller those errors are, the more accurate the data will be.

Hurting people on tribal lands the most

The shortened timeline for counting will be especially hard on Alaska Native and American Indian peoples on tribal lands, who have historically low response rates, in part because of longstanding distrust of the U.S. government, which has a history of violating treaties and imposing other injustices on Indigenous peoples.

In 2010, for instance, only 29.4 percent of residents of Navajo Nation lands responded to the census. At least so far in 2020, it’s even lower. For instance, as of August 28, just 17.9 percent of Navajo Nation residents have responded – and only 3.6 percent of the community used the internet to do so.

According to the latest government data, 14.1 percent of households on the Navajo Nation reservation do not have telephone service, and 71.5 percent of them don’t have internet service. That’s compared with 2.2 percent of all U.S. households lacking phone service and 14.7 percent lacking internet service.

The low Navajo Nation response rate could be due to several other reasons, too. Many Navajo Nation households have no formal home address. Instead, they get their mail at post office boxes, which in some cases can be 70 miles from their homes. That’s difficult, and expensive, to do – and may involve violating the Navajo Nation’s COVID-19 public health emergency curfew orders.

Long-term effects of undercounts

Census data is used to determine how many members of Congress a state should have and to draw boundaries for congressional and state legislative districts. If the census records too few people in communities of color, those people will have fewer representatives in government, and less power to choose them.

In addition, census data is used to allocate billions of dollars in public spending by states and the federal government. Communities that are larger than their official count registers will receive smaller amounts than they should of taxpayer money that provides education, health care and transportation to their residents.

Communities that are home to Native Americans, Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are particularly sensitive to these effects because these groups are numerically small. So any one person not counted represents a larger proportion of the community as a whole, and a larger share of money and representation deserved but not received.

If these errors are allowed to happen – and made worse by a shorter timeline – their effects on Americans will last an entire decade, until the 2030 Census is completed.

Aggie J. Yellow Horse is an assistant professor of Asian Pacific American Studies and Justice and Social Inquiry in the School of Social Transformation. Her research focuses on understanding social determinants of racial health disparities by examining the influences of sociohistorical and neighborhood contexts.

View all posts by Aggie Yellow Horse

Related Articles

New SSRC Project Aims to Develop AI Principles for Private Sector
Industry
July 19, 2024

New SSRC Project Aims to Develop AI Principles for Private Sector

Read Now
Reflections of a Former Student Body President: ‘Student Government is a Thankless Job’
Insights
July 1, 2024

Reflections of a Former Student Body President: ‘Student Government is a Thankless Job’

Read Now
Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work
Social Science Bites
July 1, 2024

Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work

Read Now
Why We’ve Had to Dramatically Shift How We Talk About UK Politics
Insights
June 25, 2024

Why We’ve Had to Dramatically Shift How We Talk About UK Politics

Read Now
Pandemic Nemesis: Illich reconsidered

Pandemic Nemesis: Illich reconsidered

An unexpected element of post-pandemic reflections has been the revival of interest in the work of Ivan Illich, a significant public intellectual […]

Read Now
How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Yes, dad jokes can be fun. They play an important role in how we interact with our kids. But dad jokes may also help prepare them to handle embarrassment later in life.

Read Now
Beyond Net-Zero Targets: When Do Companies Maximize Their Potential to Reduce Carbon Emissions?

Beyond Net-Zero Targets: When Do Companies Maximize Their Potential to Reduce Carbon Emissions?

Companies with a better understanding of climate change, the authors argue, have realized the need to plan actions beyond the business level.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments