Research

The Invisible Challenges ‘Foreign’ Authors Must Face

June 8, 2022 1518

‘Scholars from the periphery’ often pay a price — unintentional but no less real — for their geography. In this post, Amon Barros and Rafael Alcadipani, both professors at Fundação Getulio Vargas’s Sao Paulo School of Business Administration (FGV EAESP), reflect on their paper, “Decolonizing Journals in Management and Organizations? Epistemological Colonial Encounters and the Double Translation,” published in Management Learning.

The idea for publishing “Decolonizing Journals in Management and Organizations? Epistemological Colonial Encounters and the Double Translation” in Management Learning emerged almost naturally from our everyday interactions with “international” academia. Our school is heavily focused on increasing its global reach. Although we recognize our privileges for having this opportunity, we also live with the challenges emerging from entering new frontiers and becoming “native.” We always highlight among ourselves and our students that when you are aiming for an international audience, you need to be prepared for at least three challenges. First, the language barriers; second, the translation of ideas that goes beyond writing and communicating in English and includes learning new aesthetics for writing a manuscript. Finally, the difficulties emerging from being read as an “other” someone coming from a different place sometimes borders xenophobia.

Business and management INK logo in orange

We also realized that networking and politics impact which papers are accepted or rejected. Being from Brazil puts people in a disadvantageous position to build up successful networks that can help foster publications in top international journals.

We believe that our piece successfully developed these ideas and brought up the need for journal communities, including editors and reviewers, to think of new and more inclusive ways of bringing diverse research and scholars and broaden the scope of their conversations. For instance, they could assign associate editors that can evaluate an idea in its original language before asking for full papers in English or even having an entire process conducted in a different language. Although our proposals might sound fancy to some, social sciences are heavily dependent on communicating ideas through written words, sometimes unable to rely on numbers or formulas.

Amon Barros, left, and Rafael Alcadipani

Additionally, it is essential to stress the material costs of being an international scholar. Most academics coming from outside rich countries cannot afford to even dream of participating in these areas. However, in Brazil, the pressure is increasing for forced internationalization, which sometimes leads researchers, especially young scholars, into a dead-end. Also, the community must recognize that some of the difficulties international scholars face do not come from lack of talent, or inability to communicate in English, but often not-so-subtle gatekeeping coming from prejudice. If we do not talk about it openly, we will not challenge those terrible practices and create mechanisms and incentives for greater inclusivity.

Our piece is innovative because we take the point of view of scholars from the periphery who tries to publish in “international” journals and participate in an academic setting that is different and sometimes distant from the Brazilian reality. We share and expose the difficulties of this process. By doing that, we indicate the colonial logics which per passes many academic journals and international arenas and propose feasibly actions that can be taken to try to make journal publications less unequal.

Amon Barros is a professor at FGV EAESP in graduation and Master and Doctorate courses in Business Administration. He was elected as division chair track of Critical Management Studies (CMS), Academy of Management (2018-2023). He was a Visiting Fellow at the University of Birmingham (2016) and a Doctor (2013) and master (2009) in administration from CEPEAD/UFMG, having spent six months at Lancaster University Management School. Rafael Alcadipani is a Full Professor at EAESP-FGV and full associate at the Brazilian Forum on Public Security. Ph.D. from the Manchester Business School. He is currently deputy head of the Department of General Administration and Human Resources at FGV-EAESP and a member of the Scientific Committee of the Organizational Studies Division of Anpad.

View all posts by Amon Barros and Rafael Alcadipani

Related Articles

Survey Suggests University Researchers Feel Powerless to Take Climate Change Action
Impact
April 18, 2024

Survey Suggests University Researchers Feel Powerless to Take Climate Change Action

Read Now
Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change
Bookshelf
March 29, 2024

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

Read Now
Three Decades of Rural Health Research and a Bumper Crop of Insights from South Africa
Impact
March 27, 2024

Three Decades of Rural Health Research and a Bumper Crop of Insights from South Africa

Read Now
Using Translational Research as a Model for Long-Term Impact
Impact
March 21, 2024

Using Translational Research as a Model for Long-Term Impact

Read Now
Coping with Institutional Complexity and Voids: An Organization Design Perspective for Transnational Interorganizational Projects

Coping with Institutional Complexity and Voids: An Organization Design Perspective for Transnational Interorganizational Projects

Institutional complexity occurs when the structures, interests, and activities of separate but collaborating organizations—often across national and cultural boundaries—are not well aligned. Institutional voids in this context are gaps in function or capability, including skills gaps, lack of an effective regulatory regime, and weak contract-enforcing mechanisms.

Read Now
Norman B. Anderson, 1955-2024: Pioneering Psychologist and First Director of OBSSR

Norman B. Anderson, 1955-2024: Pioneering Psychologist and First Director of OBSSR

Norman B. Anderson, a clinical psychologist whose work as both a researcher and an administrator saw him serve as the inaugural director of the U.S. National Institute of Health’s Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research and as chief executive officer of the American Psychological Association, died on March 1.

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy

Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy

Euan Adie, founder of Altmetric and Overton and currently Overton’s managing director, answers questions about the outsized impact that SBS makes on policy and his work creating tools to connect the scholarly and policy worlds.

Read Now
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments