Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?
The landscape of academic grant funding is notoriously competitive and plagued by lengthy, bureaucratic processes, exacerbated by difficulties in finding willing reviewers. Distributed […]
The team at the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, or DORA, is celebrating its 12th birthday by launching “A Practical Guide to […]
Nominations are open for the 2025 John Maddox Prize, an international award that recognizes researchers who have defended scientific evidence and advanced […]
Public trust in scientists is vital. It can help us with personal decisions on matters like health and provide evidence-based policymaking to […]
When scientists make important discoveries, both big and small, they typically publish their findings in scientific journals for others to read. This […]
Megan Stevenson’s work finds little success in applying reforms derived from certain types of social science research on criminal justice.
Yes, dad jokes can be fun. They play an important role in how we interact with our kids. But dad jokes may also help prepare them to handle embarrassment later in life.
David Canter rues the way psychologists and other social scientists too often emasculate important questions by forcing them into the straitjacket of limited scientific methods.
Drawing on a study of Crossref DOI data, Martin Eve finds evidence to suggest that the current standard of digital preservation could fall worryingly short of ensuring persistent accurate record of scholarly works.