International Debate – Page 50 – Social Science Space

International Debate

Why the Stevens Op-Ed is Wrong
Impact
June 26, 2012

Why the Stevens Op-Ed is Wrong

Read Now
Marketing Manager for Social Sciences and Science, Technology and Medicine.  British Library
International Debate
June 26, 2012

Marketing Manager for Social Sciences and Science, Technology and Medicine. British Library

Read Now
When the Boys Fit in Better Than the Girls
Featured
June 21, 2012

When the Boys Fit in Better Than the Girls

Read Now
Nobel Prize Winner Elinor Ostrom Leaves Legacy to Celebrate at a Time of Attacks on Value of Her Discipline
Featured
June 20, 2012

Nobel Prize Winner Elinor Ostrom Leaves Legacy to Celebrate at a Time of Attacks on Value of Her Discipline

Read Now
A Regulated Free Press – Compromise or Contradiction?

A Regulated Free Press – Compromise or Contradiction?

Lord Hunt, Chair of the Press Complaints Commission, and Angela Phillips, Chair of the Ethics Committee of the Coordinating Committee for Media […]

Read Now
The Politics of Dissent

The Politics of Dissent

Recently, The Independent published a brief piece on the ‘slave-like’ working conditions of PhD students at UK universities. This sounds dramatic, but it’s hardly news – the problem has been around for years. The question arises why dissent did not emerge earlier and more forcefully.

Read Now
Political Science Serving the Public Interest

Political Science Serving the Public Interest

On May 9, the House of Representatives adopted a provision that would preclude the National Science Foundation (NSF) from supporting research in the field of political science.

Read Now
Teaching Internet Ethics

Teaching Internet Ethics

Apparently Luka Rocco Magnotta made videos of himself killing cats and eating parts of his murdered victim, making the videos available online.  […]

Read Now
SAGE opposes the Flake Amendment

SAGE opposes the Flake Amendment

Recently, the US House of Representatives passed off an amendment offered by Representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ) that would prohibit funding for the Political Science Program with the National Science Foundation. If enacted into law, this amendment would set an extraordinary and disturbing precedent in which Congress chooses which scientific disciplines should be funded and not funded within the NSF’s research portfolio.

Read Now
Growing Old: Something to Fear or Celebrate?

Growing Old: Something to Fear or Celebrate?

We have just witnessed a long weekend full of remarkable imagery celebrating longevity.   However,  media images of later life normally take two extremes – adverts […]

Read Now
Avner de-Shalit on the Spirit of Cities

Avner de-Shalit on the Spirit of Cities

Some people have strong and visceral reactions to cities. They might love or loathe New York, or Jerusalem, or Berlin. This may have something to do with the architecture and the infrastructure of a place; it may also be a response, at some level, to the people, the culture, the politics, the way of life. Avner de-Shalit claims that some cities – not all cities but some – have a spirit.

Read Now
Rejoinder to Gary Guttings Doubts about the Behavioral Sciences

Rejoinder to Gary Guttings Doubts about the Behavioral Sciences

We have reached a stage in the scientific understanding human behavior where very significant improvements in human wellbeing can be achieved.

Read Now

Subscribe to our mailing list

Get the latest news from the social and behavioral science community delivered straight to your inbox.