Business and Management INK

Announcing the Winner of the Fritz Roethlisberger Memorial Award for 2013!

July 17, 2014 1116

We are pleased to congratulate Indiana University’s Janet Hillier and Linda M. Dunn-Jensen, who have received the Fritz Roethlisberger Memorial Award for 2013. Their paper “Groups Meet…Teams Improve: Building Teams that Learn” appeared in the October 2013 issue of Journal of Management Education.

Jane Schmidt-Wilk, Chair of the OBTS 2014 Fritz Roethlisberger Memorial Award Committee, commented in the announcement that appeared in Journal of Management Education:

We also found clear linkages to Roethlisberger’s legacy. For example, Roethlisberger advocated the view, novel at his time, that the workplace is a complex social system, and this social system influences work behavior. This insight is JME_72ppiRGB_powerpointcentral to our award-winning article’s contribution. Hillier and Dunn-Jensen point out that teaching teamwork commonly involves requiring students to provide individual-level feedback to team members. Unfortunately, this approach is often counterproductive: “Feedback at the individual level of analysis often consists of individual team members reviewing other members’ performance, which can have deleterious consequences and often lead to hurt feelings, anger, finger-pointing, and withdrawal” (p. 707).

Instead, Hillier and Dunn-Jensen focus attention on the group as a whole and emphasize consistent, structured team-level feedback as a mechanism to gauge team performance. They propose that the processes and procedures that facilitate organizational learning can be applied to facilitate team learning. They provide a learning team model that builds on a foundation of team feedback, which is integrated with a team charter and a formal team assessment process. Using the model takes students through repeated cycles of inquiry and learning, paralleling Roethlisberger’s own commitment to inquiry and learning.

This teaching innovation article also satisfied our human interest criterion. The authors provide all the necessary materials for implementing their approach, examples of its application in three different class settings at the graduate and undergraduate levels, and both quantitative and qualitative evidence of student learning. One committee member noted, “The feedback from students the authors provided in the article is testament to the real discoveries that students derive from taking part in this activity.”

The abstract of “Groups Meet…Teams Improve: Building Teams that Learn”:

Although most business students participate in team-based projects during undergraduate or graduate course work, the team experience does notalways teach team skills or capture the team members’ potential: Students complete the task at hand but the explicit process of becoming a team is often not learned. Drawing from organizational learning and group/team theory, this article presents a “learning team model” that emphasizes feedback at the team—not individual—level of analysis by establishing a team feedback tool that can be easily and regularly used to improve performance. In addition to the feedback tool, a structured process is presented in which students learn to become a team.

Click here to read “Groups Meet…Teams Improve: Building Teams that Learn” for free for the next 30 days from Journal of Management Education. Stay up to date on all the latest news and research from Journal of Management Education! Click here to sign up for e-alerts!

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory
Business and Management INK
July 25, 2024

We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory

Read Now
Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events
Business and Management INK
July 23, 2024

Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events

Read Now
Funny or Functional: Customer Engagement in Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Services
Business and Management INK
July 22, 2024

Funny or Functional: Customer Engagement in Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Services

Read Now
‘Push, Pull, Dance’: Public Health Procurement – Saving Lives and Preventing Harm
Business and Management INK
July 18, 2024

‘Push, Pull, Dance’: Public Health Procurement – Saving Lives and Preventing Harm

Read Now
Leading Boards in Chaos and Uncertainty? Have an Enlightened Approach

Leading Boards in Chaos and Uncertainty? Have an Enlightened Approach

This article addresses the pivotal question of what sets well-governed companies apart from those jeopardizing stakeholders’ wealth and well-being, and argues that the key to sustainability and effective governance lies in the presence of an enlightened chair.

Read Now
Studying Leadership Coaching in the Workplace

Studying Leadership Coaching in the Workplace

Tatiana Bachkirova and Peter Jackson reflect on coaching and other factors that led to the publishing of their research article, “What do leaders really want to learn in a workplace? A study of the shifting agendas of leadership coaching,”

Read Now
The Case of Leftist Governments in Chile and Uruguay

The Case of Leftist Governments in Chile and Uruguay

In this article, Juan Bogliaccini and Aldo Madariaga explore leftist governments in peripheral economics — the topic of their recently published article, […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments