Social, Behavioral Scientists Eligible to Apply for NSF S-STEM Grants
Solicitations are now being sought for the National Science Foundation’s Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics program, and in an unheralded […]
We’re pleased to congratulate Achilles Armenakis, winner of the Journal of Applied Behavioral Science‘s Best Reviewer Award for 2013! Dr. Armenakis graciously […]
We’re pleased to announce that William L. Gardner of Texas Tech University has been appointed as the new Editor of Group and […]
World Future Review is a refereed journal that seeks to expand communication among the researchers and practitioners now exploring trends and alternatives […]
An experiment on economists looked at offering small stipends for reviewers, as well as tighter deadlines and dollop of public shaming. Which worked, and could this have implications beyond this field and this journal? Max Nathan discusses.
Could the increasing number of retractions in quality journals be a sign that its time to embrace post-publication open evaluation as a corrective to pre-publication peer review?
We’ve all heard the phrase “peer review” as giving credence to research and scholarly papers, but what does it actually mean? How […]
A young researcher offers her take on the peer review after attending a Sense About Science session on the subject.
The possible retraction of a high profile paper in the medical sciences offers a teachable moment about replication, peer review, cognitive bias and the beauty and beastliness that can be science.