Academic Funding

“Social Scientists Need to Make a Stronger Case for Their Worth” Academic Funding
by federico stevanin

“Social Scientists Need to Make a Stronger Case for Their Worth”

October 31, 2012 2159

by federico stevanin

Social scientists need to make a strong case for their worth inside and outside of academia to take advantage of the opportunities they have at a time of challenges for the sector, said Sir Howard Newby, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Liverpool.

Speaking at a roadshow for the Campaign for Social Science in Keele on 24 October, Sir Howard said there were two areas where “we have some reasons to be anxious.”

One was “the impact of the fees regime on demand for social science subjects – there was a marked decline in demand for admissions to many social science subjects last year, and humanities subjects as well, and that is a concern and underlies the need to make the case much more widely than just within the academic community. ”

The second was the shift from ‘responsive mode’ grants, given to single researchers by research councils, to “large-scale multi-disciplinary, programmatic, top-down, specified forms of funding” on themes such as climate change, sustainability, security and public health.

Sir Howard said that “the danger is that sometimes the role assigned to the social scientists in these circumstances is what I call ‘under-labourer’ one – science and technology change the world and social scientists come along to lubricate the public acceptability of certain scientific and technical changes.

“It takes quite a long time to wean some elements of the science community off that approach to social science.”

However, the funding shift was “a big opportunity for social science, and many science and engineering colleagues do genuinely wish to collaborate with the social science community to address contemporary problems which don’t present themselves bundled up into 19th century discrete categories.”

Sir Howard, who is President of the Academy of Social Sciences, which launched the Campaign, gave as an example of success the Strategic Advisory Committee for the Rural Economy and Land Use Programme, which he chaired, and which had brought scientists and social scientists together successfully.

He said the Campaign for Social Science had been launched because “we felt the profile of the social sciences could be raised not least with government and more generally in the policy environment, but also to instil more of a sense of self- confidence in the social science community itself both inside the academic world and outside.

“There is nevertheless a lot of opportunity for social science,” he said, and it would need to make a “strenuous” case for its value. He told the audience that “we need you behind us” in order to campaign effectively.

Ceridwen Roberts, a Campaign board member, said that social science was under-represented in the senior levels of government and that was why the Campaign was arguing for the restoration of the Government Chief Social Scientist post, which was removed in 2010.

Social scientists were “not visible enough to politicians” and were “not giving enough evidence to Select Committees” in the way that pressure groups did. However the Academy of Social Science and the learned societies were now doing more in this area.

The Campaign was setting up a media database because social scientists did not figure in the media as much as they ought to, she said. “We’ve got to get much better at showing that we are ready to speak on social science issues and have people who are competent and authoritative.”

She said that aims for the Campaign included trying to ensure that there were enough British students studying social sciences at post-graduate level, and making sure that large-scale surveys, such as the national census, were not abolished.

Stephen Anderson, the Campaign Director, thanked Keele University for its support of the Campaign.

He said that the Campaign had developed a relationship with government and was now a trusted resource, giving advice and recommendation to several government departments.

It also organised conferences and other events, such as the roadshows, which were set up to encourage support and to bring people from different disciplines together.

The Campaign had no government funding but instead had support from six publishers, 22 learned societies and 32 universities.

It also produced the Making the Case series of booklets giving examples of how social science research had helped society and influenced policy. Booklets on Scottish research, mental wellbeing and public health were due out soon.

The event was introduced and co-organised by Professor Fiona Cownie at Keele.

The university’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Nick Foskett, spoke at the event.

“I’m very supportive of the actions we can take to promote the social sciences,” he said. “I’m a social scientist by background and believe passionately in the role of social science in higher education. Keele is keen to underline that importance and to support the Campaign.”

Read Related Articles

Campaign for Social Science Roadshows

Rejoinder to Gary Guttings Doubts about the Behavioral Sciences

The State of Social Science: only itself to blame?

Why the Stevens Op-Ed is Wrong

The Academy of Social Science’s mission is to promote social sciences in the United Kingdom for the public benefit. The academy is composed of individual academicians and learned societies; it responds to government and other consultations on behalf of the social science community, organizes meetings about social science and seminars on topics that span social science disciplines, and sponsors a number of efforts that promote social science and enhance its value to society.

View all posts by Academy of Social Sciences

Related Articles

A Double Blow: The UK’s Higher Education Sector in Turmoil
Higher Education Reform
March 11, 2026

A Double Blow: The UK’s Higher Education Sector in Turmoil

Read Now
Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal
Artificial Intelligence
March 10, 2026

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Read Now
Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026
Research
March 9, 2026

Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Read Now
Performing the University: Influencers, Content Creators, and the Crisis of Scholarship
Higher Education Reform
March 4, 2026

Performing the University: Influencers, Content Creators, and the Crisis of Scholarship

Read Now
Universities in Transition: Reclaiming Values in a Competitive Age

Universities in Transition: Reclaiming Values in a Competitive Age

The French university system has been the subject of continuous reforms for over three decades, resulting in profound structural transformations. Rooted in […]

Read Now
After the University, Where is Knowledge Headed?

After the University, Where is Knowledge Headed?

Today, universities no longer function as stable centers of knowledge. Around the world, higher education is undergoing structural transformations. South Korea is […]

Read Now
Notes on Political Repression, Academic Freedom, and the Future of the University

Notes on Political Repression, Academic Freedom, and the Future of the University

In the second semester of my first year of full-time teaching as a “newly minted Ph.D.,” I stood before my class rehashing […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments